10900 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90024
U.S.A.
History of Castle & Cooke, Inc.
Castle & Cooke, Inc. has two core businesses, including real estate development and hotel management, and food processing. The company owns vast residential real estate properties in Hawaii, California, and Arizona, and also holds commercial and industrial properties in the same locations. Castle & Cooke also own and manages office buildings, apartment complexes, shopping centers, luxury resort hotels, luxury vacation homes, and golf courses. Yet the company is best known for its ownership of Dole Food Company which is famous for its Dole Pineapple. Castle & Cooke, Inc.'s real estate revenues amounted to approximately $308 million in fiscal 1996, but its food operations brought in an astounding $3.8 billion in sales.
Early History
In 1837 Samuel Northrup Castle and Amos Starr Cooke landed on Hawaii, then known as the Sandwich Islands, as part of the Seventh Reinforcement of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, to begin their lives as lay missionaries. Castle's assignment was to order, unload, and distribute supplies for the mission depository. Cooke's job was to teach the "natives"--he taught the children of the royal families who then ruled the various islands for many years.
Over the years Castle, who felt Cooke's accounting abilities would help the depository, kept trying to convince his friend to join him. Cooke firmly declined until 1849, when his schooling of the royal children was complete. He needed to make a living since monetary support from Missions headquarters had been discontinued.
That year Castle suggested to Cooke that they set up a partnership to take over the operation of the depository as a private enterprise. Money could be made by trading with the community at large, while mission posts could be supplied at cost. They took up the matter with the Mission Board in Boston, which, after two years, decided to release the partners from the mission and pay each a yearly salary of $500. On June 2, 1851, their partnership began, and a sign reading "Kakela me Kuke" ("Castle & Cooke") was installed at the entrance to the Honolulu depository.
Business began with a bang. In their first year in business, profits came to nearly $2,000. In 1853 a branch store was opened downtown, to be closer to the considerable action the California Gold Rush brought. Also in 1853, Castle and Cooke purchased their first ship, the Morning Star to ship produce to California. By 1856, the partners elected to sell the depository, located on the outskirts of Honolulu, to concentrate on their burgeoning downtown business.
In 1858 Castle and Cooke first ventured out of the mercantile business to make an investment in the new sugar industry. In the late 1860s they branched into the shipping business, handling shoreside business for a number of transpacific schooners and several inter-island vessels. Despite these diversifications, however, the mercantile portion of the business continued to provide the bulk of the profits.
As time went on, Joe Atherton, Cooke's son-in-law, handled more and more of the day-to-day business while Castle devoted most of his time to public affairs. On July 14, 1894, 10 days after the Republic of Hawaii was proclaimed, Samuel Castle died at the age of 86.
On December 28, 1894, the Castle & Cooke partnership was incorporated and Joe Atherton was elected president. At this time the company was just coming out of a financial slump caused by its 1889 investment in a sugar development called Ewa Plantation on the island of Oahu. To provide the huge amount of money needed to fund the project, Castle & Cooke had sold a large part of its holdings, including its valuable interests in the Haiku and Paia sugar plantations on Maui. The company continued to believe in the profitability of the Ewa Plantation and the risk paid off. By 1898, its production totaled 18,284 tons of sugar; in 1925 it reached 50,000. To add to the abundance, when Congress annexed Hawaii in August 1898, sugar prices rose.
Also in 1898, the original merchandise business was sold. Diversification did not stop, however. In the ensuing years Castle & Cooke involved itself in an (unsuccessful) automobile company, the Hawaiian Fertilizer Company, and a big but short venture into the sugar refinery business with the Honolulu Sugar Refining Company. Although C & C had been in the shipping business for 50 years, a 1907 agreement with William Matson to be the agent for his Matson Navigation Company greatly increased the business in this area. The agreement endured for 56 years, most of them profitable.
In 1916 Edward Davies Tenney, a Castle nephew, became chairman of Castle & Cooke and a year later president of Matson Navigation upon William Matson's death. He held these posts for more than 30 years, until his death in 1934. Tenney became chairman just as the United States was entering World War I. Hawaii was a long way from the war zone; the only real effect of the war was to drive up the price of sugar, increasing Castle & Cooke's profits. Within a few months after the war, Tenney began to act on his prewar decision to diversify. He acquired for the company an assortment of stocks and bonds, including shares in the Bank of California, Pennsylvania Railroad, California Telephone and Light, Poulsen Wireless, Santa Cruz Portland Cement, and Sterling Oil & Development.
His next big project was the company's entrance into the travel business. In 1925 a group of entrepreneurs decided that the travelers on their luxury cruise lines needed a glamorous place to stay during their trip to Hawaii. As president of the Territorial Hotel Company (almost half of the directors worked for Castle & Cooke) Tenney oversaw the building of the $2 million Royal Hawaiian. In the long run the hotel was a flop, but news of its glamour ranged far.
The company's growth continued when Matson bought the Los Angeles Steamship Company to ward off its taking over his luxury steamship trade. Castle & Cooke, along with Matson Navigation, was now the largest steamship system in the Pacific.
The Great Depression and World War II
The Depression was less severe in Hawaii than on the mainland. Although Castle & Cooke never missed a dividend payment, the year-end bonus in 1931 included a warning that it probably would not be repeated. In April 1932, salaries and pensions were cut. By the time Alexander G. Budge became president in 1935, Castle & Cooke was already making a rapid recovery, in large part due to its 1932 purchase from Jim Dole of a 21 percent interest in his Hawaiian Pineapple Company. The Waialua Agricultural Company (part of Castle & Cooke) had already acquired a one-third share of Hawaiian Pineapple in a 1922 lease agreement. The purchase caused hard feelings between Dole and Castle & Cooke. After the reorganization, Dole was made chairman of the board, but was immediately sent on a "well-earned rest" from which he was never recalled. When he finally returned in 1933 he found his office moved to a storeroom.
World War II had a much more immediate effect on Castle & Cooke than the first war had. The military requisitioned most of the canned fruit that Hawaiian Pineapple and other companies produced, the cannery was blacked out completely, and chunks of acreage were converted to potatoes and other vegetables to help feed the military and local populations. Equipment and manpower were also commandeered; the labor force was cut in half, and key officials were given wartime jobs. Even so, sugar plantations stayed at close to normal production levels and with careful planning, enough vessels were made available to carry some crops to the mainland.
Growth in the Postwar Era
As life returned to normal after VJ day in 1945, the question of statehood for Hawaii resurfaced. During and just before the war, articles had appeared in the mainland press criticizing what were termed feudal practices in Hawaii, especially by the Big Five companies there, which included Castle & Cooke. Many in Hawaii, especially heads of the bigger corporations, felt that this problem was hindering Hawaii's acceptance into statehood. The heads of 15 Hawaiian companies employed a New York public relations firm to make a study of the island's industry and social structure and tell them what to do. The report recommended that the leading island companies divest themselves of stock in rivals and foster real competition. Budge had already done this, limiting himself to positions on the boards only of the seven companies in which Castle & Cooke held a large financial stake. The company also disposed of holdings in agencies that were its competitors; Matson followed suit and several big estates were broken up and distributed among the heirs.
The labor movement also picked up again after the war, and Castle & Cooke's operations were involved in several disputes. In late 1946 the International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union (ILWU) led a strike of 28,000 workers on 33 sugar plantations. The strike lasted 79 days; all over the islands irrigated cane dried and lost its sugar-bearing juice, resulting in a loss of some $20 million of sugar. Then in April 1949 the union called out 2,000 longshoremen, cutting off all of Hawaii's supplies completely: nothing could come into the islands and nothing could be shipped to the mainland. This remarkable strike lasted 179 days and in the end the union lost its major demands, but it gained rank and file solidarity. During the strike, no goods could travel on the Pacific coast, but cargoes could and did use Gulf and Atlantic docks, giving Hawaii's economy links to the Atlantic coast for the first time in almost a century.
As the Hawaiian Pineapple Company suffered losses due to another strike in 1952, Budge kept pushing for diversification to end the firm's dependence on sugar and pineapple. In 1946 Hawaiian Tuna Packers had been purchased for this reason, and in 1948 Castle & Cooke organized the Royal Hawaiian Macadamia Nut Company as well.
Throughout its history, Castle & Cooke had only owned real estate indirectly, as an investor in agricultural businesses. In 1958 that changed: Helemano Company, Ltd. was merged into Castle & Cooke, adding 27,000 acres of land to its holdings.
Finally, in 1959, Hawaii became a state. Also in 1959, Malcolm MacNaughton became the president of C & C. He believed that an entirely new corporate structure was needed to promote the company's growth.
Through the years, Hawaiian Pineapple had been run independently, but in the late 1950s frictions reached a point of no return. Henry White, who had run the company for many years, had made some decisions about diversification that Budge had strongly disagreed with. As Hawaiian's profits fell, White was moved out of his position and in 1961 the company was merged into Castle & Cooke, adding another 15,000 acres to C & C's holdings.
The same year, Columbia River Packers (renamed Bumble Bee Seafoods, Inc.) was merged into Castle & Cooke, making the company an important player in the food industry, along with its shipping, stevedoring, and merchandising businesses.
By this time, Castle & Cooke owned 155,000 acres of land in Hawaii and a ranch in California. To manage and develop this property, Oceanic Properties was formed as a wholly owned subsidiary. The subsidiary's projects have included new towns, golf courses, apartment and medical buildings, and downtown development worldwide.
International development became a reality when Dole Philippines was organized in 1963 to farm 18,000 acres on the island of Mindanao. The decision to farm abroad was made when management felt that costs, especially labor, were too high.
Castle & Cooke then turned to bananas. With cash from the sale of Matson (in 1964) and Honolulu Oil, Castle & Cooke purchased a 55 percent share of Standard Fruit and Steamship Company of New Orleans; the rest of the stock was purchased in 1968. By 1973 Donald J. Kirchoff, C & C's executive vice president on the project, had made Castle & Cooke the U.S. leader in the banana market.
Restructuring and Transition
By the beginning of the 1970s a decision was made to bring the various companies together, tightening the loose-knit corporate structure. In 1972 a complete corporate revamping took place. Kirchoff, now president, felt that C & C had always just evolved rather than grown according to a plan. Now the company was a group of unrelated businesses, including a 26-store retail chain, a plate glass company in the Philippines, a drainpipe company in Thailand, and a quarry in Malaysia. The first step was to centralize food marketing and corporate financial administration in San Francisco, with headquarters to remain in Honolulu. This move eliminated overlapping assignments and allowed for a 30 percent reduction in corporate staff. Tight central controls were established over budgets and results reviewed quarterly against performance. All food activities except sugar were brought into a single group, Castle & Cooke Foods. Real estate activities and manufacturing and merchandising were organized into two additional groups. Rather than buying companies, "just because the numbers looked good," Kirchoff used planned diversification, buying companies in fast-growing niches of the food market.
Over the next several years, Kirchoff's plan worked extremely well. Between 1972 and 1978, earnings rose about 20 percent a year. The bubble burst, however, in 1979. Besides bad luck with the weather, some critics claimed that the expansion program was just too ambitious; for example, C & C's movement into the European banana market ended up causing an oversupply.
C & C's problems persisted into the early 1980s. In July 1982, Kirchoff resigned and Henry Clark assumed interim responsibilities. The company tried moving in directions that would not be as cyclical--regional preparation centers to prepare vegetables for fast food restaurants, for example. When Ian Wilson became president, he concentrated on three main areas--fresh produce, packaged foods, and real estate. In 1983, he purchased the A & W root beer business, and at the same time placed more emphasis on marketing and advertising. Castle & Cooke's current logo for Dole brands was introduced as part of a drive to establish itself as a premier marketer of fruits around the world.
The next few years were turbulent ones for Castle & Cooke. The company was the subject of several takeover bids, by Houston investor Charles Hurwitz in 1984, then by Minneapolis investor Irwin L. Jacobs, and finally by David Murdock, who merged C & C with his Flexi-Van Corporations in July 1985 to keep the company from going bankrupt.
Murdock, who installed himself as chairman and CEO of his new company, took firm control of Castle & Cooke, reorganizing it into a holding company for three separate operations: Flexi-Van, Dole Food, and Oceanic Properties, and relocating its headquarters to Los Angeles. Prospects began to brighten immediately and kept improving.
By the late 1980s, Castle & Cooke's Dole Foods had become the world's largest pineapple marketer, ranked second in banana sales, and also became a leading purveyor of iceberg lettuce, celery, cauliflower, broccoli, and other vegetables. The company owned vast amounts of land around the world: 28,000 acres in Honduras, 12,000 in Costa Rica, 18,400 in the Philippines and 5,000 in Thailand, as well as approximately 46,000 acres in the United States. Through Oceanic Properties the company also owned 151,000 acres, including virtually the whole Hawaiian island of Lanai, extensive property in Oahu, and 5,200 acres in California.
Almost immediately after his takeover of the company, Murdock let it be known that Dole Foods was for sale. As a result, he began to shop the food operation of Castle & Cooke to the highest possible bidder. However, as Dole Foods continued to bring in larger and larger amounts of revenue, Murdock changed his mind and, by the late 1980s he was adding to the Dole Foods product line.
Itching for something to do, Murdock then decided to develop Lanai island, traditionally known for its pineapple growing, into a lavish resort for tourists. He built two luxury hotels in 1991, and added a second golf course in the same year. Unfortunately, the entire project cost $550 million and the venture lost $117 million during the first two years of its operations.
Undeterred, Murdock went headlong into other expensive real estate development projects. During the mid-1990s, he began to develop the swanky Sherwood Country Club & Estates located in Los Angeles, California. Taking money from Dole Foods to convert a washed-out gully into a luxury golf course and tennis club, the corporate raider also spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on transplanting 1,500 California oak trees to create beautiful fairway for golfers. Yet the development project bled Dole Foods dry and, as a result, Murdock began to use some of his own personal resources in the project. Yet Sherwood failed to show a profit and Murdock personally fell into debt and began selling off shares of his Dole Foods stock.
In spite of these circumstances, Murdock seems committed for the short term at least to keep both Castle & Cooke and Dole Foods in good running order. Although the real estate development projects of Castle & Cooke are at the whim of Murdock, the continued success of Dole Foods will keep Murdock's real estate dreams alive.
Principal Subsidiaries: Flexi-Van Corp.; Castle & Cooke Fresh Fruit, Inc.; Castle & Cooke Fresh Vegetables, Inc.; Castle & Cooke Kabushiki Kaisha, Limited (Japan); Castle & Cooke Worldwide Limited (Hong Kong); Intercontinental Transportation Services, Limited (Liberia); Dole Philippines, Inc. (Republic of the Philippines); Dole Thailand, Ltd. (Thailand); Kohala Corporation; Oahu Transport Company, Ltd.; Oceanic Properties, Inc.; Pina Antilana, S.A. (Honduras); Produce Continental, Limited (Bermuda); Produce International A.B. (Sweden); Standard Fruit and Steamship Co.
Related information about Castle
Castles were the products of feudal society as it spread across
Europe and into the Crusader kingdoms. Found in France from the
mid-10th-c, they reached England as a result of the Norman
Conquest, where they were built in large numbers by the new Norman
elite. The earliest English castles were normally earthen mounds
surrounded by ditches and topped by wooden towers. In 12th-c
England, castle-builders increasingly used stone for towers and
walls, and in the 13th-c Edward I built a fine series of castles in
Wales (eg Caernarfon, Conwy, Harlech). Castles served as
residences, seats of justice, administrative centres, and symbolic
manifestations of lordly authority. Despite their defensive
features, the main value of castles in war was their offensive role
in mastering the surrounding countryside. They were often
ineffective in frontier defence, and from c.1200 advances in siege
warfare and, especially important, the 16th-c development of
firearms further reduced their defensive capacity. Later in the
Middle Ages, especially in England, increasing emphasis was placed
on their non-military roles, with greater concessions to domestic
comfort and ornamental display, while growing to accommodate large
royal retinues. Many beautiful examples of European castles survive
as testimony to their country's history, such as Hradト溝ny Castle,
Prague, which was a 9th-c fortress and is now a vast presidential
residence.
See also castle (disambiguation).
A castle (from the Latin castellum) is a structure that is fortified for
defence against an enemy and generally serves as a military
headquarters dominating the surrounding countrysidedictionary.reference.com/search?q=castle. The term is
most often applied to a small self-contained fortress, usually of the
Middle Ages.
Despite this, "castle" sometimes denotes a citadel (such as the castles of
Badajoz and Burgos) or small detached
forts d'arrテェt in modern times and, traditionally, in
Britain it has also been
used to refer to prehistoric earthworks
(e.g.
Definition
Castle comes from the Latin word castellum meaning
"fortress". The word
"castle" (castel) was introduced into English shortly before the
Norman Conquest to
denote this new type of fortress, then new to England, brought in
by the Norman knights
whom Edward the
Confessor had sent for to defend Herefordshire against the
inroads of the Welsh.
Terminology
In Spain, a fortified
dwelling on a height for the administering authority retains its
Moorish name of
alcテ。zar,
whilst shiro also figure prominently in Japanese history, where
the feudal daimy?
inhabited them.
A French castle is a chテ「teau-fort, for in French a simple
chテ「teau connotes a grand country house at the center of an estate. When European
castles were opened up and expanded into pleasure dwellings and
power houses from the late 15th century, their "castle"
designations, relics of the feudal age, often remained attached to the dwelling,
resulting in many un-castlelike castles and chテ「teaux. This is the
purpose behind such stereotypically castleish features as portcullises, battlements, and drawbridges.
- Secondly, castles were offensive weapons, built in otherwise
hostile territories from which to control surrounding lands, as
forward camps. In
particular, during the High Middle Ages, castles were often built for
territorial expansion and regional control. This can best be seen
in castles such as Bodiam Castle in Kent, whose defensive appearance was probably built
merely to impress; Central to the castle was the keep, or donjon, the main commanding tower. Later castles
were built on a concentric plan, where two heavily towered walls
formed two rings around the keep. for example a castle built on
top of a hill would generally take much longer to build than a
castle located on terrain that was easier to build upon, while a
Norman motte and baily castles could be constructed in a year or
less, a large stone castle could take decades. Examples of this
design which have survived to the second millennium are Muchalls Castle and
Neidpath
Castle. Because of the proliferation of European castles,
this article will follow a European timeline.
Early castles
From as early as late Neolithic times, people built hill forts to protect
themselves. Many earthworks survive today, along with evidence of
the use of palisades to
accompany the ditches.
The Romans commonly encountered hill forts (referred to by Julius
Caesar as oppida). Their
own fortifications were more elaborate, and varied from the
temporary earthworks thrown up by armies on the move, to stone
constructions, notably the milecastles of Hadrians Wall.
The Roman engineer Vitruvius was the first to note the three-fold
advantages of round defensive towers; more efficiency of use of
stone, improved defence against battering rams and improved field of fire. They were
built by the Normans.
When William
the Conqueror invaded and conquered England, he brought along
the practice of building a castle to protect and hold the land.
They were an instrinsic element in his strategy for conquest and
the original castle he built at Pevensey was brought across as a prefabrication, a detail
revealed by the Bayeux Tapestry.
These early castles were called motte and bailey, as they consisted of an earthen
mound or motte, frequently
topped with a wooden tower. An encircling protective wall (the
bailey) afforded
additional protection for the owner's animals, buildings and
workers.
In the wake of the Norman Conquest of England, Norman kings and their
barons constructed a plethora of castles to impress, control, and
conquer the native population. This proliferation of castles, which
made them iconic of the Middle Ages, is called encastellation. Around
the crest of its summit was placed a timber palisade. It is clearly depicted at the time of the
Conquest in the Bayeux Tapestry, and was then familiar on the mainland
of western Europe.
A description of this earlier castle is given in the life of
John, bishop of Terouanne
(Ada Sanctorum, quoted by GT Clark, Medieval Mil. St
John, bishop of Terouanne, died in 1130, and this castle of
Merchem, built by a lord
of the town many years before, may be taken as typical of the
practice of the 11th century. But in addition to the mound, the
citadel of the fortress, there was usually appended to it a
bailey or
basecourt (and sometimes two) of semilunar or horseshoe shape, so that the
mound stood on the line of the enceinte.
The rapidity and ease with which it was possible to construct
castles of this type made them characteristic of the Conquest
period in England and of
the Anglo-Norman settlements in Wales, Ireland and the Scottish lowlands.
Stone structures
In later days a stone wall replaced the timber palisade and
produced what is known as the shell-keep, the type met with in the
extant castles of Berkeley, Alnwick and Windsor.
But the Normans introduced also two other types of castle. the
other was a type wholly distinct, the high rectangular tower of
masonry, of which the
Tower of London
is the best-known example, though that of Colchester was probably
constructed in the 11th century also. The whole fortress thus
formed was styled a castle, but sometimes more precisely "tower and
castle," the former being the citadel, and the latter the walled
enclosure, which preserved more strictly the meaning of the Roman
castellum.
Reliance was placed by the engineers of that time simply and solely
on the inherent strength of the structure, the walls of which
defied the battering
ram, and could only be undermined at the cost of much time and
labour, while the narrow apertures were constructed to exclude
arrows or
flaming brands.
Concentric and linear castles
At this stage the crusades, and the consequent opportunities afforded to
western engineers of studying the solid fortresses of the Byzantine empire,
revolutionized the art of castlebuilding, which henceforward
follows recognized principles. The idea of the flanking towers
(which were of a type very different from the slight projections of
the shell-keep and rectangular tower) soon penetrated to Europe,
and Alnwick Castle (1140-1150) shows the influence of the new
system.
But the finest of all castles of the Middle Ages was Richard C?ur de
Lion's fortress of Chテ「teau-Gaillard Les Andelys. An angle of the noble keep of
Rochester was undermined and brought down by John in 1215.
The next development was the extension of the principle of
successive lines of defence to form what is called the "concentric" castle,
in which each ward was placed wholly within another which enveloped
it; In these cases, the fall of the inner ward by surprise,
escalade, vive force,
or even by ordinary siege (as was sometimes feasible), entailed the
fall of the whole castle. A typical case will be found in the
history of Brandenburg and Kingdom of Prussia (Carlyle, Frederick the Great,
bk. i.), the impregnable castle of Friesack, held by an intractable
feudal noble, Dietrich von Quitzow, being reduced in two days by
the elector Frederick I with "Heavy Peg" (Faule Grete) and
other guns hired and borrowed (February 1414). In England, the earl
of Warwick in 1464 reduced the strong fortress of Bamburgh in a week, and
in Germany, Franz von Sickingen's stronghold of Landstuhl, formerly
impregnable on its heights, was ruined in one day by the artillery
of Philip of Hesse (1523). Very heavy artillery was used for such work, of course, and
against lighter natures, some castles and even fortified
country-houses or castellated mansions managed to make a stout
stand even as late as the great castles erected by Henry VIII,
especially those at Deal, Sandown and Walmer (c. 1540), which
played some part in the events of the 17th century, and of which
Walmer Castle is still the official residence of the lord warden of
the Cinque Ports.
In the 16th century the feudal fastness had become an
anachronism.
In the Scottish
highlands of the seventeenth century, as elsewhere, the need
for the defensive strength of castles lessened, but the image of
power and control remained important at a time when the laird of the castle had
considerable judicial powers over his clan and the main hall of
the castle served as a local court. Here and there we find old
castles serving as forts d'arret or block-houses in mountain passes and
defiles, and in some few cases, as at Dover, they formed the
nucleus of purely military places of arms, but normally the castle
falls into ruins, becomes a peaceful mansion, or is merged in the
fortifications of the town which has grown up around it. Examples
of such castellated mansions are seen in Wingfield Manor,
Derbyshire, and Hurstmonceaux, Sussex, erected in the 15th century, and nearly all
older castles which survived were continually improved and altered
to serve as residences. Under its twofold aspect of a fortress and
a residence, the medieval castle is inseparably connected with the
subjects of fortification (see also siegecraft) and domestic
architecture. Castle walls, together with lodgings (keep) suitable for a Lord, as well as lower grade
housing within the walls to accommodate some of the key population
of the local area, served this purpose.
Castles were also developed to defend key part of the countryside
such as a mountain pass or river estuary, and often made use of the
natural geography to support the defensive walls through
exploitation of cliffs, rivers, hills, and the like. Some well
known examples include:
- Edinburgh
Castle
- Wawel
Castle
- Prague
Castle
- Tower of
London
- Moscow
Kremlin
- Windsor
Castle
- Dover
Castle
- Castel
Sant'Angelo in Rome
- Castrum
Danorum in Tallinn
For a more complete list see List of castles.
In addition to the castle walls, other defensive features
include towers at the angular direction changes of walls, moats, drawbridges, battlements, portcullises, and concentric
walls.
The traditional mechanism used to occupy a castle would normally
be to lay siege whereby a
surrounding army would camp
out of range of attack and wait for the internees to run out of
either food or water. Offensive techniques would include the use of
catapults, siege engines, battering rams and later
mortar and
cannon.
Influence of castles in Britain
Such strongholds as existed in England at the time of the
Norman Conquest
seem to have offered little resistance to William of
Normandy, who, in order effectually to guard against invasions
from without as well as to awe his newly-acquired subjects,
immediately began to erect castles all over the kingdom, and
likewise to repair and augment the old ones. Besides, as he had
parcelled out the lands of the English amongst his followers, they,
to protect themselves from the resentment of the despoiled natives,
built strongholds and castles on their estates, and these were
multiplied so rapidly during the troubled reign of King Stephen that
the "adulterine" (i.e. unauthorized) castles are said by one writer
to have amounted to 1115.
In the first instance, when the interest of the king and of
barons was identical, the
former had only retained in his hands the castles in the chief
towns of the shires, which
were entrusted to his sheriffs or constables. It was, therefore, the settled policy of the
crown to strengthen
the royal castles and increase their number, while jealously
keeping in check those of the barons. These in many cases acted as
petty sovereigns, and such
was their tyranny that
the native chronicler
describes the castles as "filled with devils and evil men."
Henry II, in
spite of his power, was warned by the great revolt against him that
he must still rely on castles, and the massive keeps of Newcastle upon Tyne
and of Dover date
from this period.
Under his sons the importance of the chief castles was recognized
as so great that the struggle for their control was in the
forefront of every contest. When Richard made vast
grants at his accession to his brother John, he was careful
to reserve the possession of certain castles, and when John rose
against the king's minister, William Longchamp, in 1191, the custody of castles
was the chief point of dispute throughout their negotiations, and
Lincoln was
besieged on the king's behalf, as were Tickhill, Windsor and Marlborough subsequently, while the siege of Nottingham had to be
completed by Richard himself on his arrival. To John, in turn, as
king, the fall of Chテ「teau Gaillard meant the loss of Rouen and of Normandy with it, and when he
endeavoured to repudiate the newly-granted Magna Carta, his first step
was to prepare the royal castles against attack and make them his
centres of resistance. The barons, who had begun their revolt by
besieging that of Northampton, now assailed that of Oxford as well and seized that of
Rochester. The
king recovered Rochester after a severe struggle and captured
Tonbridge, but
thenceforth there was a war of sieges between John with his
mercenaries and Louis with his Frenchmen and the barons, which was
specially notable for the great defence of Dover Castle by Hubert de Burgh against
Louis. On the final triumph of the royal cause, after John's death,
at the Battle of
Lincoln, the general pacification was accompanied by a fresh
issue of the Great Charter in the autumn of 1217, in which the
precedent of Stephen's reign was followed and a special clause
inserted that all "adulterine" castles, namely those which had been
constructed or rebuilt since the breaking out of war between John
and the barons, should be immediately destroyed. And special stress
was laid on this in the writs addressed to the sheriffs.
In 1223 Hubert de Burgh, as regent, demanded the surrender to the
crown of all royal castles not in official custody, and though he
succeeded in this, Falkes de Breautテゥ, John's mercenary, burst into
revolt next year, and it cost a great national effort and a siege
of nearly two months to reduce Bedford Castle, which he had held. The Provisions of
Oxford included a list of the chief royal castles and of their
appointed castellans with the oath that they were to take; When war
broke out it was Rochester Castle that successfully held Simon de Montfort at
bay in 1264, and in Pevensey Castle that the fugitives from the rout of
Lewes were able
to defy his power. Finally, after his fall at Evesham, it
was in Kenilworth
Castle that the remnant of his followers made their last stand, holding out
nearly five months against all the forces of the crown, till their
provisions failed them at the close of 1266.
Thus for two centuries after the Norman Conquest castles had proved
of primary consequence in English political struggles, revolts and
warfare.
Gallery
Image:SDJ_Harlech_Castle_Gatehouse.jpg|The main gatehouse of
Harlech Castle,
Wales
Image:Vyborg castle.jpg|The Vyborg Castle
Image:HradcanyPolWiki.jpg|Prague Castle
Image:Craigievar castle 1991.jpg|Craigievar Castle in
Aberdeenshire,
completed in 1626
Image:Wawel_castle.jpg|Wawel Castle, Poland
Image:Uppsala slott-2.jpg|Uppsala Castle, Sweden
Image:Burg Eltz 1.jpg|Burg
Eltz, Germany
Image:Alcazar-Segovia.jpg|The Alcテ。zar of Segovia, Spain
Image:Bran Castle.jpg|Bran Castle, Romania
Image:Wenecja ruins.jpg|The ruins of the 14th century castle in
Wenecja near ?nin, Poland
Image:Mota-Castillo de la Mota.jpg|La Mota, mudテゥjar Castle, in Medina del Campo,
Spain. Castile
means "Land of Castles"
Image:Tarascon Castle.jpg|Front of Tarascon Castle, France
Image:Dol-ksiaz.jpg|Ksi?? Castle, Poland
Image:Hunedoara-castle-side.jpg|Hunyad Castle,Romania
Image:Moszna zamek3.jpg|Castle in Moszna, Poland
Image:Ireland-Cahir Castle.jpg|Cahir Castle in Ireland
Image:Rakvere-castle.jpg|Rakvere castle Rakvere,Estonia
Bibliography
GT Clark, Medieval Military Architecture in England (2
vols.), includes a few French castles and is the standard work on
the subject, but inaccurate and superseded on some points by recent
research;
See also
- Castle-guard
- List of
castles
- Encastellation
- Castellan
- Defensive
wall
- Medieval fortification
- Medieval
warfare
- Motte-and-bailey
- Alcテ。zar (Spanish castles)
- Shiro (Japanese castles)
- Gusuku
(Okinawan
castles)
- Kremlin
(Russian
castles)
Sources
User Comments Add a comment…